The approach to losing fat has changed and we’re all to blame. Should we thank the technology? Our busy lifestyles don’t often allow for sufficient exercise to stay in shape, especially prior to an event that is last minute. The quick fix culture requires something that will help us achieve our fitness goals quicker and with less effort. Fortunately, we can make use of technology.
The non-invasive method of body sculpting is now the preferred treatment option for famous people as well as athletes and anyone who simply wants to eliminate those stubborn pockets of fat, without having to spend hours at the gym or to the doctor. Due to the increasing popularity of this new method to losing weight increasing numbers of salons and clinics are investing in technology for body sculpting and are quickly noticing the benefits for their clients as well as their earnings. However, with the variety of different technologies for body shaping accessible, it’s difficult to determine the right equipment to meet the needs of your client. This is where we can assist.
Which are the best methods for reducing fat?
There are two major ways to achieve non-invasive fat reduction: melting fat and freezing. The first method is radiofrequency (RF) that converts electrical energy into heat under the skin and causes cellulite to melt. Fat freezing can be achieved by Cryolipolysis (Cryo) that utilizes sub-zero temperatures to freeze fat cells. Both methods result in the process of lipoapoptosis in which the cells that store fat are eliminated and fat is eliminated by the lymphatic system in the body.
In contrast to the thermometer each Radiofrequency and Cryolipolysis are an viable alternative to surgical intervention that has proven successful with numerous treatment courses that have drastically decreased waistlines. What is the difference between these two different techniques contrast?
Clinical application
Therapists are more active in RF treatments by using the treatment hand piece to glide over the targeted area to create an even result, without any gaps. When using Cryo treatment the therapist only needs to install the Cryo applicators and then activate them. But since Cryo application devices are stationary during treatment , and they are usually rather large treatments are limited to more extensive body parts like the legs, abdomen, and back. Contrary to this the RF treatment can be done nearly everywhere on the body including areas of concern for excessive body weight or loose skin, such as the neck and arms.
What do “fat melting” and “fat freeze’ mean to customers?
Clients usually experience an incredibly warm and comfortable sensation when they undergo the body sculpting process using radiofrequency as well as when paired with other complementary techniques such as massage (to boost lymphatic drainage) It’s quite relaxing.
Unfortunately, the same cannot be said about Cryolipolyisis. The suction on the skin that pulls it and the cold temperatures of -11degC could make the procedure extremely uncomfortable. The patients may also experience a soreness in their joints after their fat freezing procedure, like an injury to a muscle that is minor or a vigorous exercise.
Potential side effects
To use Fat Melting treatments to effectively reduce the fat cells and increase collagen production, an ideal temperature range of 40-42 degrees Celsius is required on the surface of your skin. A variety of RF devices that are advanced include integrated temperature monitoring systems to make sure that therapeutic temperatures are safe and not over-extended and reduce the risk of injury to the skin.
While not common”ice burns” are a problem in Cryolipolysis. Additionally, treatments that freeze fat have the potential of causing paradoxical hyperplasia of the adipose. This negative reaction to treatment causes the fat cells and the treatment area growing rather than becoming smaller.
Fat Melting vs Fat Freezing treatment results
Although both techniques provide efficient treatments for reducing fat Cryolipolysis does have its own apparent drawbacks. The results are confined on the site of treatment, and have little effect on the skin’s laxity and the lymphatic drainage is slow.
Most often, clients notice a significant reduction in their waistline measurements immediately following treatment, however this is not reliable and a bit misleading since cells generally shrink in response to cold. While Cyrolipolysis treatments are typically used in conjunction with other body-sculpting techniques like ultrasonic cavitation treatments, they aren’t able to be used in tandem, leading to an rise in the time required for treatment.
Studies conducted in clinical trials have repeatedly shown that RF is the more efficient of the two techniques and has better results over a wider area, significant skin tightening and more lymphatic drainage, which is crucial for quicker results. In addition, when it is combined with other techniques, such as infrared, it has proven to provide significantly better outcomes. This technology-based approach is the favorite of many aesthetic surgeons who utilize RF to enhance and improve the results of surgery-related liposuction.
What’s the next step for Non-surgical methods to reduce fat?
The desire for slimmer waistlines won’t go down the road. Motivated by the popularity of celebrity endorsements and a “quick-fix trend More people than ever are looking for fat-loss methods.
In introducing this service to your salon, you’ll be able to remain ahead of the game and provide your clients with the body they’ve always dreamed of. It may be a natural follow-up in the treatment of hair lasers or it could be paired with other treatments to make the perfect aesthetic package.
Copyright – Classicalnet